My mostest favorite (um...not) neighborhood busybody and issue-of-the-moment crusader has taken up Breed Specific Legislation as her cause du jour. As we all know, I am a cat owner. As you may not know, I adore dogs. Rotties are among my favorites and I have met many Pits that are among the most beautiful and sensitive creatures I have encountered on this planet. My sister is a Chow girl and, lucky for her, a home owner in a state that bans Breed Specific Legislation (NJ).
Ironically, this neighborhood busybody does not live in my immediate neighborhood but she has managed to infiltrate all my neighborhood listservs so I am frequently subjected to her crusades against everything. I pick and choose my battles but seem to have kicked off a number of responses against her outcry today. Here is my response (which earned me a thank you for being rational from one neighbor so far) to her call for "outright ban that meets judicial muster" in response to a "Pit Bull mauling":
Breed Specific Legislation has been shown to be ineffective in dealing with issues regarding dog biting incidents. The Humane Society of the United States Statement on Dangerous Dogs and Breed Specific Legislation (http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affect ing_our_pets/dangerous_dogs.html) sites good information on why this is the case. Additionally, many professionals that deal with dogs have position statements against Breed Specific Legislation. Irresponsible people that abuse animals need to be punished, not entire animal breeds.
Association of Pet Dog Trainers Position Statement- http://www.apdt.com/about/ps/breed_spec ific_legis.aspx
American Kennel Club Position Statements- http://www.akc.org/pdfs/canine_legislat ion/PBLEG2.pdf
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Position Statement- http://www.aspca.org/about-us/policy-po sitions/breed-specific-legislation.html
Several states, —including California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Virginia—have laws barring municipalities and counties from targeting individual breeds.
I encourage all animal lovers to petition our city for smart legislation that holds dog owners liable for the actions of dangerous animals, has meaningful consequences for raising animals in abusive conditions, but does not target individual breeds based on stereotypes and media hype.
Ironically, this neighborhood busybody does not live in my immediate neighborhood but she has managed to infiltrate all my neighborhood listservs so I am frequently subjected to her crusades against everything. I pick and choose my battles but seem to have kicked off a number of responses against her outcry today. Here is my response (which earned me a thank you for being rational from one neighbor so far) to her call for "outright ban that meets judicial muster" in response to a "Pit Bull mauling":
Breed Specific Legislation has been shown to be ineffective in dealing with issues regarding dog biting incidents. The Humane Society of the United States Statement on Dangerous Dogs and Breed Specific Legislation (http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affect
Association of Pet Dog Trainers Position Statement- http://www.apdt.com/about/ps/breed_spec
American Kennel Club Position Statements- http://www.akc.org/pdfs/canine_legislat
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Position Statement- http://www.aspca.org/about-us/policy-po
Several states, —including California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Virginia—have laws barring municipalities and counties from targeting individual breeds.
I encourage all animal lovers to petition our city for smart legislation that holds dog owners liable for the actions of dangerous animals, has meaningful consequences for raising animals in abusive conditions, but does not target individual breeds based on stereotypes and media hype.
2 comments | Leave a comment
